Discussion:
[Konversation-devel] [konversation] [Bug 335603] New: make nick box ignore text past NICKLEN (or similar)
Fuchs
2014-05-30 17:16:27 UTC
Permalink
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335603

Bug ID: 335603
Summary: make nick box ignore text past NICKLEN (or similar)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: konversation
Version: 1.5
Platform: Gentoo Packages
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: NOR
Component: general
Assignee: konversation-***@kde.org
Reporter: ***@fuchsnet.ch

As discussed on IRC:

could you please add a possibility to resize the nick text box to a sane width
without restarting konversation? I managed to have it use ~50% of the available
width ...

You suggested limiting it to NICKLEN, which is a sane and good idea. In
addition to that I think it would be nice if you could maybe also change it on
nick change to something like it is on startup (which looks like
current_nick_lenght + ~2 characters) to avoid wasting space that can be used on
the input lenght.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1) Change nick to something incredibly long by pasting something in the nick
textbox
2) Receive an error due to it being longer as NICKLEN
OR
- Change the nick to something long on purpose (yes, stupid idea, but some
people do that)
- Change nick back to a sane lenght
Actual Results:
Nick box takes up a lot of horizontal space (up to 50% is what I achieved),
thus limiting available space for the input text box

Expected Results:
Nick box is resized to sane width
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Andrew Crouthamel
2018-11-11 04:31:16 UTC
Permalink
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335603

Andrew Crouthamel <***@kdemail.net> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REPORTED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Crouthamel <***@kdemail.net> ---
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test
if the bug is valid in the latest version? I am setting the status to NEEDSINFO
pending your response, please change the Status back to REPORTED when you
respond.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Andrew Crouthamel
2018-11-21 04:47:53 UTC
Permalink
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335603

Andrew Crouthamel <***@kdemail.net> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Crouthamel <***@kdemail.net> ---
Dear Bug Submitter,

This is a reminder that this bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you
help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version? This bug
will be moved back to REPORTED Status for manual review later, which may take a
while. If you are able to, please lend us a hand.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Christian (Fuchs)
2018-11-21 10:21:54 UTC
Permalink
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335603

--- Comment #3 from Christian (Fuchs) <***@fuchsnet.ch> ---
yep
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Loading...